A.GhA.Gh 40744 gold badges88 silver badges1414 bronze badges three I’m afraid that proofreading is explicitly off-subject matter below. Begin to see the FAQ for details, and tips tips on how to rewrite your question into one thing that might be appropriate.
behaves as a modal verb, so that questions and negatives are formed without the auxiliary verb do, as in it used never to be like that
Stack Exchange network is made of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for builders to understand, share their knowledge, and Make their careers. Take a look at Stack Exchange
"That that is true" will become "That which is true" or simply, "The truth." I do that not because it is grammatically incorrect, but because it is more aesthetically pleasing. The overuse of your term "that" is often a hallmark of lazy speech.
is compactness to the goal House needed for existence for extending steady functionality from dense subspace?
The construction that will get pronounced with /zd/ goes similar to this: A shovel is used to dig with. That's not an idiom, and never a constituent, either.
If a "that" is omitted, it's the main a person that is eliminated. Replacing the second "that" with "it" may clarify points:
user144557user144557 111 gold badge11 silver badge11 bronze badge one Officially It really is "used to become" (and that ought to be used in penned text), but even native English speakers simply cannot detect the difference between "used to get" and "use being", when spoken.
"That bike that is blue" will become "the bike which is blue" or just, "the blue bike." Therefore: "That that is blue" gets "that which is blue" or perhaps "what is blue" in some contexts.
Stack Exchange network is made of 183 Q&A communities together with Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for builders to understand, share their knowledge, and Develop their careers. Take a look at Stack Exchange
z7sg check here Ѫz7sg Ѫ 13.3k1919 gold badges6666 silver badges102102 bronze badges 13 Not eager to go with a nit below, but for that second remedy, what does "did not use to get" suggest?
It is more than standard looking to me, since like many here I'm often looking into what terms where used for
could be the relative pronoun used for non-animate antecedents. If we develop the shortest of the OP's example sentences to replace the pronoun that
As for whether it's "official English" or not, I'd personally say that it is. It can be used within the AP Stylebook, for example.